Grace Behind Bars (Day 5)

2–3 minutes

read

When Christ Is Preached Anyway – Rejoicing even in imperfect witness

Paul’s imprisonment could have silenced him. Instead, it sparked a wildfire. Word of his imprisonment spread, and suddenly others spoke about Jesus more boldly—though not all from pure motives. Some were encouraged by Paul’s courage; others tried to make things harder for him. Rivalries and mixed motives were alive even in the church’s earliest days.

By now you might not be surprised to read that Paul still rejoices:

“But whether or not their motives are pure, the fact remains that the message about Christ is being preached, so I rejoice.” (Phil. 1:18 NLT)

Rivalry in the First-Century Church

We can wrongfully imagine the early church as a unified, harmonious community. In reality, Paul’s letters reveal tensions—between Jewish and Gentile believers, between different teachers, and even between church leaders themselves. If that was true then, just a few decades removed from Jesus, how much more so now! Rival preachers may have been jealous of Paul’s influence, or seen his imprisonment as an opportunity to advance their own reputations. Their motives were suspect, but the message they carried still pointed to Jesus. Paul could separate the purity of the gospel from the impurity of the messenger.

A megaphone resting on a newspaper with a shadow of a cross cast on it, symbolizing the message of faith and communication.

A Modern Parallel: Faith and Politics Today

This strikes close to home. After the assassination of Charlie Kirk, debates quickly erupted over whether he was a “true Christian” and whether his preaching faithfully represented the gospel. The conversations quickly turned to angry and sharp words of accusation, exposing the fractures in how people tie faith to politics, culture, and identity.

For many, there’s a discomfort in seeing the gospel wrapped so tightly with political agendas. Faith can be—and often is—co-opted. The unease is justified. Paul himself would never have blindly endorsed every preacher or motive. And yet, while acknowledging the misplaced motives, he could still say: Christ is preached.

Imperfect Messengers, Perfect Message

Paul’s perspective forces us to confront a hard truth: none of us represent the gospel without bias or blind spots. Our words and actions are always filtered through our cultures, personalities, and limitations. And yet God works through it all. His Spirit moves even when the vessel is cracked, even when motives are muddled.

That doesn’t mean we stop discerning or addressing distortion. But it does mean we hold space for mystery—for God’s ability to use imperfect voices to point toward Jesus.

Living This Out

Instead of fixating on whether others are “doing it right,” what if we focused more on our own faithfulness? What if we trusted God to work even through voices that make us uncomfortable, while ensuring our own witness reflects the humility and grace of Christ?


Journaling Prompt

Where do you struggle most with other people’s ways of presenting the gospel or talking about God? How can Paul’s words free you to trust God’s ability to work even through flawed messengers?

Breath Prayer

“Jesus, be proclaimed—through others, through me, even through imperfection.”

Hi there 👋
It’s great that you are here.
I’d be honoured if you subscribe!

Subscribe to receive awesome content in your inbox every time I publish something new. Be the first to know when my next devotional comes out.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

4 responses to “Grace Behind Bars (Day 5)”

  1. I’ve been thinking about this as well, although more in the context of denominations and church unity (or lack thereof), rather than church leadership/politics.

    In a lot of debates revolving denominational validity, many have argued how their believes were more in line with the early church/Apostles’ teachings – but, as you mentioned in this article, there are a lot of divisions and disagreements even among the early church, and at the end of the day, we are to put our faith in God, not in the Apostles, Church Fathers, or other human authority.

    I completely agree with your statement that our words and actions are always filtered through our cultures, personalities, and limitations. Now, I believe the Bible is inerrant, but it is likewise filtered through the writer’s cultures & personalities – as many scholars and preachers often say: “The Bible is written for us, but not to us.” When trying to emulate the Apostles teaching’s, one of the primary challenge is to decide which instructions are for all believers for all times, which are culture specific (e.g. most agree that Paul’s instructions on women’s headwear is cultural, there are less unanimous agreement about whether his word against women headship is universal or cultural).

    I don’t believe that any single person, or denomination, has everything 100% right, so no denomination has any right to look down on any other just for interacting with the Body of Christ differently. Different people have different sensitivities and needs – and Paul himself strives to be able to “be all things for all people” to accommodate the specific cultural/regional concerns and challenges, while still remaining true to the Gospel.

    At the end of the day, devotion to Christ should come before loyalty to specific denominations, doctrines, evangelists, pastors, and leaders.

    1. Thanks for your thoughtful comment V.E.

      You’ve captured the tension that runs through church history: the beauty of God working through culture and personality, and the messiness that comes with it. This is certainly true when we consider the number of different denominations.

      I appreciate your pointing out that devotion to Christ must come before loyalty to any denomination, leader, or doctrinal emphasis. Paul’s reminder to “be all things to all people” has so much wisdom for us today—it calls us to hold conviction without arrogance, and unity without demanding uniformity.

      Your comment reminds me that grace doesn’t erase our differences but gives us the posture to meet one another in humility, patience, and love.

      1. “Unity without demanding uniformity” is such an astute statement that perfectly captures the Body of Christ analogy. It’s also one of the main reasons why I find Protestantism more appealing than Catholicism or Orthodoxy. It allows a greater freedom for disagreement (e.g. John MacArthur and R.C. Sproul famously disagreed on infant Baptism) while still affirming unity.

        Now this may be outrageous opinion, but I believe Paul’s message in 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 support this, especially when considering the historical context of the early church. The Corinthians were splitting themselves between followers of Paul, Apollos, Peter, and those who saw themselves as above factions and are directly following Christ’s teachings.

        Paul rebukes them for their pride and infighting, but he never said that the Corinthians should stick only to his teachings, even though he could make the case that he has a better grasp of theology than Peter (whom he once rebuked for hypocrisy at Antioch, and whose teachings Peter acknowledged to be tougher to learn) and Apollos (who began his ministry with incomplete picture of the Gospel, and had to be corrected by Priscilla and Aquila – lay believers).

        We can’t make a good witness to the world if they see Christians attack, belittle, and demonize each other for different interpretations of doctrines that means very little to those outside the church.

        By God’s grace, He can and will draw His people back home in spite of our poor representation, but if people who preach grace won’t show grace to even fellow believers, that really makes people question the truth of that message.

        (Sorry I’m rambling a lot, but the issue about division in the church is becoming more visible and concerning, and as much as we like to say that Christianity is a personal relationship between us and God, the church community is an essential part of that.)

      2. There is no need to apologize for the rambling! I appreciate you taking the time to engage. You’re naming something important. 1 Corinthians 1 is a good example because it shows that division is not a new problem. From the beginning, Christians have struggled with identity, allegiance, and pride, and Paul kept pointing them back to Christ.

        You’re right that our witness suffers when grace in our doctrine isn’t matched by grace in our posture toward one another. The world doesn’t see our finely tuned theological distinctions. It sees whether we live the love we proclaim.

        Your words remind me that even in the mess of division, God’s grace still works to draw people to Himself. And maybe our role is less about “winning” the argument and more about showing that kind of grace to each other, so that Jesus Himself is what shines through.

Leave a Reply to GeorgesCancel reply

Discover more from Qoheleth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading